Fluid Phenomena in Scramjet Combustion Systems, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol.28, issue.1, pp.323-360, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.fl.28.010196.001543
Hypersonic airbreathing propulsion, AIAA Education Series, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.2514/4.470356
Shock train and pseudo-shock phenomena in internal gas flows, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol.35, issue.1, pp.33-100, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0376-0421(98)00011-6
Scramjet performance, Scramjet Propulsion of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, pp.369-439, 2000. ,
Flight Data Analysis of the HyShot 2 Scramjet Flight Experiment, AIAA Journal, vol.44, issue.10, pp.2366-2375, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0045-7930(97)00014-5
Ground testing of the HyShot supersonic combustion flight experiment in HEG and comparison with flight data, AIAA Paper, 2004. ,
Experimental investigation of different scramjet hydrogen injection systems, Proc. 6th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles, 2009. ,
Methodology of a combined ground based testing and numerical modelling analysis of supersonic combustion flow paths, Shock Waves, vol.34, issue.4, pp.353-366, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00193-010-0269-8
Investigation of Unsteady/Quasi-Steady Scramjet Behavior using High-Speed Visualization Techniques, 18th AIAA/3AF International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.2514/2.5287
Transient fluid-combustion phenomena in a model scramjet, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.4, pp.85-120, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0376-0421(98)00011-6
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the HyShot II Flight Experiment, p.30 ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-16835-7_47
Incipient thermal choking and stable shock-train formation in the heat-release region of a scramjet combustor. Part I: Shock-tunnel experiments, Combustion and Flame, vol.162, issue.4, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.09.016
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01344921
CFD analysis of the HyShot supersonic combustion flight experiment configuration, AIAA Paper, 2006. ,
CFD Analysis of the HyShot II Scramjet Experiments in the HEG Shock Tunnel, 15th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jcph.2000.6671
CFD Analysis of Unstart Characteristics of the HyShot-II Scramjet Configuration in the HEG Shock Tunnel, 17th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jcph.2000.6671
CFD Analysis of Unsteady Combustion Phenomena in the HyShot-II Scramjet Configuration, 18th AIAA/3AF International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.2514/1.40868
Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations of the HyShot II Scramjet, AIAA Journal, vol.50, issue.8, pp.1717-1732, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.2514/6.2005-1099
CFD analysis of the HyShot II scramjet combustor, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol.33, issue.2, pp.2399-2405, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.proci.2010.07.055
A computational study of the HyShot II combustor performance, Proc. Comb. Inst, pp.34-2101, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.proci.2012.07.014
Fureby, LES of supersonic combustion in a scramjet engine model, Proc. Comb. Inst, pp.31-2497, 2007. ,
An eddy-viscosity subgrid-scale model for turbulent shear flow: Algebraic theory and applications, Physics of Fluids, vol.431, issue.10, pp.3670-3681, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1063/1.1350896
Stability criteria for hybrid difference methods, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.227, issue.5, pp.2886-2898, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.11.025
Effect of Shock-Capturing Errors on Turbulence Statistics, AIAA Journal, vol.48, issue.7, pp.1554-1557, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1063/1.869152
Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver, Shock Waves, vol.54, issue.1, pp.25-34, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF01414629
Unstructured Large Eddy Simulation for Prediction of Noise Issued from Turbulent Jets in Various Configurations, 17th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (32nd AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), 2011. ,
DOI : 10.2514/6.2010-3785
Characterizing the operability limits of the HyShot II scramjet through RANS simulations, 17th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1039/b010002l
A digital filter based generation of inflow data for spatially developing direct numerical or large eddy simulations, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.186, issue.2, pp.652-665, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00090-1
High-fidelity simulations and modeling of compressible reacting flows, 2014. ,
Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.504, pp.73-97, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1017/S0022112004008213
Revisited Flamelet Model for Nonpremixed Combustion in Supersonic Turbulent Flows, Combustion and Flame, vol.114, issue.3-4, pp.577-584, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00296-4
Large-eddy/Reynolds-averaged Navier???Stokes simulation of a supersonic reacting wall jet, Combustion and Flame, vol.159, issue.3, pp.1127-1138, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.10.009
An improved H2/O2 mechanism based on recent shock tube/laser absorption measurements, Combustion and Flame, vol.158, issue.4, pp.633-644, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.10.002
An efficient flamelet-based combustion model for compressible flows, Combustion and Flame, vol.162, issue.3, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.08.007
Wall-modeling in large eddy simulation: Length scales, grid resolution, and accuracy, Physics of Fluids, vol.24, issue.1, p.15105, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.2514/3.6323
Three-dimensional features of a Mach 2.1 shock/boundary layer interaction, Experiments in Fluids, vol.594, issue.5, pp.1347-1368, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.2514/8.1895
PIV investigation of spanwise variation in incident shock boundary layer interactions, in: Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena 8, 2013. ,
Wallmodeled large eddy simulation of shock/turbulent boundary-layer interaction in a duct, Annu. Res. Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, pp.49-62, 2011. ,
Reynolds- and Mach-number effects in canonical shock???turbulence interaction, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.333, pp.293-321, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1063/1.858343