Signal processing for hyperspectral image exploitation, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol.19, issue.1, pp.12-16, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1109/79.974715
Hyperspectral image processing for automatic target detection applications, Lincoln Laboratory Journal, vol.14, issue.1, pp.79-116, 2003. ,
Hyperspectral Imaging Remote Sensing: Physics, Sensors, and Algorithms, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781316017876
Detection Algorithms in Hyperspectral Imaging Systems: An Overview of Practical Algorithms, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol.31, issue.1, pp.24-33, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1109/MSP.2013.2278915
Is there a best hyperspectral detection algorithm, Proc. SPIE 7334, p.733402, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1117/12.816917
URL : http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/1721.1/52646/1/Manolakis-2009-Is%20there%20a%20best%20hyperspectral%20detection%20algorithm.pdf
Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol.19, issue.1, pp.29-43, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1109/79.974724
False-alarm regulation for target detection in hyperspectral imaging, 2013 5th IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP), pp.161-164, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1109/CAMSAP.2013.6714032
Robust anomaly detection in Hyperspectral Imaging, 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, pp.4604-4607, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1109/IGARSS.2014.6947518
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01010418
Comparative analysis of hyperspectral adaptive matched filter detectors, Algorithms for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery VI, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1117/12.410332
Regularized Spectral Matched Filter for Target Recognition in Hyperspectral Imagery, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol.15, pp.317-320, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1109/LSP.2008.917805
The CFAR adaptive subspace detector is a scale-invariant GLRT, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol.47, issue.9, pp.2538-2541, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1109/78.782198
An Adaptive Detection Algorithm, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol.22, issue.2, pp.115-127, 1986. ,
DOI : 10.1109/TAES.1986.310745
A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, vol.88, issue.2, pp.365-411, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0047-259X(03)00096-4
Sparsity-Based Cholesky Factorization and Its Application to Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Available: https, IEEE Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi- Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP-17), Curaçao, Dutch Antilles, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1109/camsap.2017.8313124
Robust shrinkage estimation of high-dimensional covariance matrices, 2010 IEEE Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop, pp.189-192, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1109/SAM.2010.5606730
Shrinkage covariance matrix estimator applied to STAP detection, 2014 IEEE Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing (SSP), pp.324-327, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1109/SSP.2014.6884641
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01104073
Generalized Robust Shrinkage Estimator and Its Application to STAP Detection Problem, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol.62, issue.21, pp.5640-5651, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1109/TSP.2014.2355779
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01104004
Sparse Representation for Target Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol.5, issue.3, pp.629-640, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1109/JSTSP.2011.2113170
A Sparse Representation-Based Binary Hypothesis Model for Target Detection in Hyperspectral Images, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol.53, issue.3, pp.1346-1354, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2337883
Robust principal component analysis?, Journal of the ACM, vol.58, issue.3, pp.1-11, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1145/1970392.1970395
Robust principal component analysis: Exact recovery of corrupted low-rank matrices via convex optimization, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22, pp.2080-2088, 2009. ,
Low-rank decomposition-based anomaly detection, Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XIX, pp.87-430, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1117/12.2015652
A Low-Rank and Sparse Matrix Decomposition-Based Mahalanobis Distance Method for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol.54, issue.3, pp.1376-1389, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2479299
Simultaneous sparsitybased binary hypothesis model for real hyperspectral target detection, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, p.17, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1109/icassp.2017.7953031
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01692408
Stable Principal Component Pursuit, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1109/ISIT.2010.5513535
URL : http://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.2363.pdf
Mapping Advanced Argillic Alteration at Cuprite, Nevada, Using Imaging Spectroscopy, Economic Geology, vol.109, issue.5, p.1179, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.2113/econgeo.109.5.1179
Effects of spectrometer band pass, sampling, and signal-to-noise ratio on spectral identification using the Tetracorder algorithm, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol.44, issue.2/3, p.5105, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0034-4257(93)90012-M
A Singular Value Thresholding Algorithm for Matrix Completion, SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol.20, issue.4, pp.1956-1982, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1137/080738970
URL : http://arxiv.org/pdf/0810.3286
Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers, Foundations and Trends?? in Machine Learning, vol.3, issue.1, pp.1-122, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1561/2200000016
Sparse and Low-Rank Decomposition for Automatic Target Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery Available: https, 2017. ,
The U. S. Geological Survey, Digital Spectral Library: Version 1: 0.2 to 3.0 micros, U.S. Geological Survey, 1993. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/in2p3-00167014
The ASTER spectral library version 2.0, Remote Sensing of Environment, vol.113, issue.4, pp.711-715, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.rse.2008.11.007