https://hal-centralesupelec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02413759Abdallah, M.N.M.N.AbdallahDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science - Syracuse UniversitySarkar, TapanTapanSarkarDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science - Syracuse UniversityMonebhurrun, VikassVikassMonebhurrunGeePs - Laboratoire Génie électrique et électronique de Paris - UP11 - Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 - UPMC - Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 - CentraleSupélec - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueSalazar-Palma, M.M.Salazar-PalmaPredicting the starting distance of the far fieldHAL CCSD2016Far FieldNear FieldRadialTransverse[SPI] Engineering Sciences [physics]Lustrement, Amandine2019-12-16 12:44:302023-03-09 10:30:172019-12-16 12:44:30enConference papers10.1109/APS.2016.76966511The far field of an antenna is generally considered to be the region where the outgoing wavefront is planar and the antenna radiation pattern has a polar variation and is independent of the distance from the antenna. Hence, to generate a locally plane wave in the far field the radial component of the electric field must be negligible compared to the transverse component. Also, the ratio of the electric and the magnetic far fields should equal the intrinsic impedance of the medium. These two requirements must hold in all angular directions from the antenna. The radial and the transverse components of the fields are space dependent so to determine the starting distance of the far field we need to examine the simultaneous satisfaction of these two properties for all θ and φ angular directions, where θ is the angle measured from z-axis and φ is the angle measured from the x-axis. The objective of this paper can be summarized in three points First, this paper intends to illustrate that 2D2 / λ formula, where D is the maximum dimension of the antenna and λ is the operating wavelength, is not universally valid, it is only valid for antennas where D andgt;andgt; λ. Second, this paper intends to compute a more specific constraint so instead of D λ we compute a threshold for D after which the 2D2 / λ formula applies. Third, this paper intends to properly interpret D in the formula 2 D2/λ when the antenna is operating over an imperfect ground plane. In this paper, we do not use 2D2 / λ for antennas operating over an imperfect ground instead we use a formula which depends on the transmitting and receiving antenna's heights over the air-Earth interface. © 2016 IEEE.